Surveys, Lattes, & Clinical Days

Five years ago I could not have told you what “public health” was…because I had never even heard the term before. Also, I knew absolutely nothing about cervical cancer before this summer, but now I am working with the Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) on a clinical trial for a pre-cervical cancer treatment: “ACT II: Acceptability and Feasibility of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer among South African Women Living with HIV“.

Me, working as diligently as I can
Me, working as diligently as I can

The clinical trial is based in South Africa, but I am working in Chapel Hill with my preceptor (my direct superior/mentor), Dr. Jessica Keys, to build a database on a website called Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), a secure survey-building software. What is a secure survey-building software? It is difficult to explain why those adjectives are important and what they mean, but I can only give a brief explanation. REDCap is used to store information such as medication taken by trial participants, symptoms after taking the precancer treatment, and diagnostics/vitals recorded during the trial to monitor the health of the participants. And REDCap is one of many services that can create surveys (such as Qualtrics or SurveyMonkey), but it is one of the most useful because it provides many security measures to prevent breaches of sensitive medical information. Before I could even look at the surveys I had to complete a series of short online quizzes/readings to gain approval into the study. Since gaining approval, I have been translating surveys that were made beforehand into digital versions on REDCap. So, I am essentially taking surveys that are on paper and copying them so that the researchers in the clinical trial can store the information online.

My first expectation for the practicum is to learn biostatistics-related skills such as how to prepare for a clinical trial, how to properly create surveys or other methods of organizing patient information, and possibly learn more about how to analyze large data sets efficiently if time permits. An important thing to know about me is that I went straight from undergrad to this grad program, so my second expectation for this practicum is to develop the professional skills that most other students developed through full time jobs like clear communication in different mediums and maintaining punctuality of assignments and meetings. So far, the practicum has exceeded my expectations.

My first task was to gain IRB approval to join the study and that process was tedious, but necessary for the overall goal of making sure that research is ethical. For example, I had to read about the issues that could lead to unethical research such as conflicts of interest and insecure health records. Luckily, I won’t need to see any patient information during my practicum so there won’t be any worry about confidentiality or data security.

An exciting screenshot of REDCap in action!
An exciting screenshot of REDCap in action!

After gaining entry to the study, I have been learning how to use REDCap and gaining tips from my preceptor on the best methods of creating digital surveys to help the research team and analysts do their jobs. Honestly, using REDCap was simple after I watched a few training videos, but the difficult part of building surveys is completing all the behind-the-scenes brainstorming that is necessary to create a high-quality survey. The first objective for building a good survey is to anticipate all the possible answer choices that a participant could give. Related to that is the necessity of providing space to explain any answers that are not popular or anticipated (i.e. “Other, specify:”). Those two objectives may seem obvious but are easy to overlook in the process of creating a survey. The third objective is to raise questions about the quality of the surveys such as: “Are the electronic surveys intuitive for the investigators who are collecting data?” or “Are there any questions that are poorly worded or difficult to translate to the electronic format?” The final objective is to increase the efficiency of communication between the creation of the survey, to collection of the data, and finally to analysis of the survey answers after the participants terminate their participation. Given these four objectives, the summation of my job this summer is to accommodate the collection of information during the trial and prepare for the summation of that information after the trial is over.

Dr. Keys at work
Dr. Keys at work

Given the position of my work along the timeline of the clinical trial (between collection of the data and analysis of that information), it is important to think about all the ways that data analysis can be made easier for whoever is looking at the results of the surveys. All the coding within the electronic surveys must be intuitive and a spreadsheet should be provided that explains how the electronic versions of the surveys match the paper surveys that were given to me.

When I am not creating surveys on my laptop (usually at Open Eye Café or Weaver Street Market) I am engaged in two other “jobs”! First, I am working part time as a barista at Joe Van Gogh Cafe, which allows me to step away from my work and make some money on the side (around 18 hours a week). Second, I am taking night classes to become an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) by the end of the summer (around 16 hours of lectures a week). Ultimately, my career goal is to become a nurse practitioner, so my experiences in public health and emergency medical services (EMS) will prepare me for my dream of practicing medicine while simultaneously building more equitable communities.

To recap, the practicum is showing me how clinical trials function internally and is indirectly teaching me about data collection. Also, my role in the clinical trial will give me the chance to meet the researchers who are leading the clinical trial in South Africa. On top of that, I will be busy with my other two jobs as a barista and an EMT. Yet, everything I am doing is leading to my goal of improving life for as many people as I can.

-Ryan

Urban Sanitation Planning in Freetown, Sierra Leone

Rachel Beardsley
Rachel Beardsley

My name is Rachel Beardsley, and I am a MPH Student concentrating in Global Health. This summer, I am working with the Water Institute at UNC and the Citywide Inclusive Sanitation Technical Assistance Hub for my Practicum. This will be my second time working with UNC’s Water Institute as I previously developed and published my thesis “Factors associated with safe child feces disposal in Ethiopia, India, and Zambia” for my Bachelors in Public Policy at UNC. During this practicum, I will be analyzing the development of a Water Supply and Sanitation Master Plan for Freetown, Sierra Leone to assist other municipalities in developing more efficient, participatory master plans that can reach all segments of the population. This will involve writing a paper on the failures of past sanitation master plans, how the master plan was developed in Freetown, and what we can learn from these experiences. It will also require me to develop communication materials for liaising with sanitation leaders so that they may incorporate lessons learned from the experiences of Freetown, Sierra Leone.

I am excited for this practicum because I will be developing practical skills, deeper knowledge on sanitation, and a greater understanding of urban planning and how guidelines/policies are developed. While I do have previous experience and knowledge on sanitation, I have mainly focused on specific point issues related to access (largely open defecation). I am lacking, however, in my knowledge on sanitation systems as a whole. This practicum will give me better insight into these systems and sanitation planning. Additionally, I am looking forward to learning about how municipalities make decisions and how they incorporate lessons from other municipalities in the development of their own policies.

Thus far, my practicum has included writing a literature review on the failures of current master plans. While writing this literature review, I found that the conventional sewerage previously implemented in these areas was not effective in keeping pace with urban growth largely due to its high cost and thus was often only implemented in more privileged areas leaving low income and vulnerable people without access to adequate sanitation. Likewise, the idea that sanitation has a one-size-fits-all solution such as conventional sewerage is harmful as not every sanitation technology fits with every local reality. Focus needs to be directed towards using multiple sanitation technologies to fit a specific context. Participatory methods are also not used as often as is necessary in the creation of master plans which leaves much to be desired in terms of knowledge on local context, use preferences, and willingness to pay. Sanitation master plans have also failed because of gaps in both evidence and capacity.  For example, a lack of long-term monitoring manifests in evidence gaps regarding sustainability of certain plans. Performance data, particularly relating to onsite sanitation services, is lacking which makes it difficult to determine which solutions work best. The capacity of local technicians and urban planners are limited. For example, the ability of technical staff to identify different sanitation systems was found to be lacking and there is confusion among local staff about common words to describe elements of sanitation systems. Staffing shortages also affect the effectiveness of a plan.

The deliverable I’m currently working on recounts how Freetown’s new master plan was developed and how it improves upon past plans. The TA Hub used field visits, technical backstopping, peer to peer learning, and capacity building to inform the new master plan. In the structuring of this master plan, I found three themes to be particularly significant. Firstly, participatory planning is essential to understand the local context for a sanitation system and to understand user preferences. Secondly, identification of the appropriate technology was emphasized. While conventional sewerage works for some areas of Freetown, simplified sewage or on-site sanitation technology may be better suited for most areas. Finally, management of sanitation across the entire sanitation chain is vital. The sanitation chain includes user interface/containment, emptying, transport, treatment, and end-use options/disposal. In the past, many development agencies and master plans focused on sanitation access and not sanitation management. For example, the Millennium Development Goals’ (MDG) only goal related to sanitation focused on access.  However, dangerous faecal pathogens enter the environment through multiple methods that cannot be solved by access alone, such as the illegal dumping of faecal sludge into drains and water sources. I found myself slightly convicted in the identification of this particular theme as I, too, have only written about issues of sanitation access without placing it in the context of sanitation management. I now see all the important areas where work needs to be done and all the various opportunities available to improve the health of populations.

My practicum has required me to learn a lot quickly, and I occasionally feel out of my depths, but thus far I have enjoyed learning more about sanitation. I feel like I’m learning important knowledge and practical skills that I will take away from this practicum. I’m excited to produce work that could help municipalities inform their sanitation plans. I believe this experience will help me gain a deeper understanding of a topic I’m very interested in as well as insight into how policies/guidelines are informed and created and how to communicate effectively with a variety of stakeholders.

-Rachel B.

Using design thinking to build a decision aid prototype

Chloe Coletta
Chloe Coletta

Coming out of the first year of my MPH program, I am amazed at the growth I have made in my knowledge and understanding of critical public health issues. I came into this program with a very broad interest in sexual and reproductive health (SRH), and over the course of nine months I have made strides in defining what a future in this field may look like for myself. I have had the opportunity to take coursework that I was truly passionate about alongside classes that brought my capabilities as a public health professional to the next level. In this last semester, I discovered a particular passion for design thinking and user experience and applying those skills towards digital health interventions. I kept my fingers crossed that a practicum opportunity would come along that checked all of the boxes: SRH-related, elements of design thinking and graphic design, and remote-friendly. When Dr. Lauren Hill posted her summer practicum opportunity for a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) shared decision-making study, I was thrilled to interview and then eventually accept an offer. I have been in this role for about three weeks now, and I have learned a lot about HIV, PrEP usage, user experience, and design thinking in a public health space.

A slide in the PrEP decision aid with statistics about HIV and cisgender women, Source: ShesPrEPared HIV Prevention Decider Tool
A slide in the PrEP decision aid with statistics about HIV and cisgender women, Source: ShesPrEPared HIV Prevention Decider Tool

The main goal of this project is to modify and develop an online shared decision-making tool for cisgender women in North Carolina who are interested in taking PrEP, a daily oral medication that prevents people from getting HIV from sex or injection drug use. A key responsibility of mine is conducting in-depth user testing interviews with sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic patients to inform the Inspiration and Ideation phases of the human-centered design thinking process. These interviews will help myself and the team to rapidly iterate the digital health prototype to make it more feasible and user friendly. During this process I will modify or develop new content for the prototype decision aid using Semblie, an online platform developed by RTI International used to build, deliver, and track digital health interventions. These initial few weeks working on this project have included learning more about the formative study that informed the development of this tool, editing the decision aid to make it more visually appealing, modifying the user testing guide, and creating a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the user testing process. My final deliverables will have three parts: 1) the final revised shared decision-making tool, 2) a user testing results report/memo for Dr. Hill and her team, and 3) a feedback memo for the Semblie team at RTI.

A slide in the PrEP decision aid with more information about PrEP, its benefits, its downsides, and how to access it, Source: ShesPrEPared HIV Prevention Decider Tool
A slide in the PrEP decision aid with more information about PrEP, its benefits, its downsides, and how to access it, Source: ShesPrEPared HIV Prevention Decider Tool
My "coworker", Red
My “coworker”, Red

I look forward to learning and growing as a public health professional during this summer practicum. My professional goals for this experience include developing and utilizing my design thinking skills, gaining experience using public health technology that is new to me, and expanding my professional network within the public health space. Working alongside Dr. Hill and Laura Wagner from RTI will help me check some of these boxes as I navigate this new territory. This position is perfect for my professional goals, and I cannot wait to start user testing this June and hit the ground running on the iterative design thinking process. I look forward to sharing more with you all at the beginning of August!

P.S. Please enjoy this photo of my “coworker”, Red. How I get anything done when he is this cute is beyond me!

-Chloe